Skip to main content

Why is it important to understand the topic of Defense Forecasts?


The consensus from a handful of defense industry reports points to a broadly positive outlook for 2024. Commercial aerospace demand is recovering as air travel activity returns closer to pre-pandemic levels, supporting increased production to work through substantial aircraft order backlogs. Similarly, defense spending is projected to increase as budgets aim to modernize weapons capabilities and counter rising competitor nation threats, particularly China. These trends provide upside for top and bottom line expansion. However, this narrowly positive industry perspective runs the risk of creating certain blindspots.

In reality, aerospace and defense firms operate within a complex global ecosystem of influences, from domestic government policies and legislation to economic conditions, trade relationships, investor preferences and societal expectations. Appreciating perspectives from other stakeholders provides contextual insights on shared priorities around goals like safety, security and sustainability. For example, government agencies shape industry trajectories based on budget priorities, technology investments in areas like hypersonics, AI, and space communications, and contracted initiatives. Recent incentives around semiconductors and clean energy demonstrate tangible legislative influence on business opportunities. Global institutions like the World Economic Forum highlight [in their ‘2024 Global Risks’ report] interconnected risks that could severely disrupt activity across borders.

An objective 2024 growth outlook must balance optimistic industry projections backed by demand tailwinds with persistent challenges and risks flagged by global stakeholders. Diverse insights reveal systemic issues requiring coordinated innovation across borders and sectors. Aerospace and defense companies must pursue clean technologies and secure AI. But environment advocates and development groups equally share the responsibility to incentivize sustainability without sacrificing safety or capabilities. Ultimately, progress persists amidst complex interdependencies by anchoring priorities to collective understanding that drives balanced solutions.


Embracing Digital Transformation in Defense

In 2024, the defense sector is witnessing an unprecedented digital transformation, shaping not only the capabilities of armed forces but also the dynamics of global security. The advent of advanced manufacturing technologies and the integration of model-based systems engineering are revolutionizing production processes.

For example, the integration of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and the seamless blending of operational technology (OT) with information technology (IT) are enhancing insights into production, enabling a level of precision and efficiency previously unattainable. This transformation extends to the maintenance and lifecycle management of defense assets, where digital twin technologies are employed for real-time tracking and optimization, mirroring the physical assets in a virtual space for better predictive maintenance and resource allocation.

Advanced Propulsion Technologies and Cybersecurity Imperatives

The defense sector’s commitment to sustainability is also evident in the exploration of advanced propulsion technologies, including electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-based systems. This shift is not merely a response to environmental concerns but a strategic adaptation to the changing nature of warfare, where logistics and speed are as crucial as firepower. Meanwhile, cybersecurity has emerged as a pivotal battlefield. The defense industry’s increasing reliance on interconnected digital systems elevates the risk of cyber threats, necessitating robust cybersecurity measures. This is especially relevant in the context of U.S.-China relations, where cybersecurity is a key area of contention and competition. The defense sector’s approach to cybersecurity now requires a proactive stance, emphasizing the development of secure digital infrastructures and continuous monitoring of regulatory activities around digital technology usage.

The Rising Influence of AI and Generative AI

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI are becoming central pillars in defense strategies. AI’s role in streamlining operations, from cockpit avionics to maintenance protocols, represents a significant leap in both tactical efficiency and strategic planning. In regions like the Indo-Pacific, where potential conflict scenarios with significant naval components are plausible, AI-driven systems are key in processing vast amounts of data for quicker decision-making and effective mission execution. Generative AI, on the other hand, is pushing the boundaries of defense technology, enabling the rapid development of energy-efficient designs and low-carbon military equipment. This technological trend is particularly relevant in the context of NATO members, where the drive for sustainable military solutions is increasingly prominent.


Overall public attitudes are difficult to pinpoint without access to recent polling data. However, people likely hold varying perspectives rooted in their broader views on military spending, fiscal policy, and threat perceptions.

Those who generally believe more spending is necessary to provide security and global leadership may be more receptive to the proposed increases. Supporters are likely to cite rising personnel costs, aging equipment in need of modernization, and persistent global threats from rivals as justifying the budgets.

Meanwhile, those already skeptical of defense spending levels and prioritizing other domestic programs may view further increases as excessive or unnecessary. Progressives especially might see ample room for efficiencies and fiscal restraint. Any cost overruns or waste may further objections.

Sentiments could split along partisan lines to some degree, but also depend on events. Major cyberattacks, aggression from adversaries, or terrorist threats could shift opinion toward seeing spending hikes as warranted. If global tensions ease and no major conflicts erupt, the opposite may occur.

Overall reception likely involves a weighing of both fiscal implications and security aims. Without clear data, speculation suggests a range spanning from supportive to skeptical among different segments of the American public. Events and threat perceptions over 2023 may prove decisive in tipping sentiment in one direction or another as budget proposals move forward.

There are many unknowns and room for nuance. But people’s preexisting attitudes and unfolding geopolitical events seem likely to steer reactions on all sides.